The role of the Directors and ASIC-Free-Samples for Students

Question: Disucss about the Compnay's Insovency and also the role of the Directors and ASIC. Answer: Introduction: Legal definition of insolvency states that company is considered insolvent, when total of the liabilities of the company exceeds the total of the assets of the company. According to section 95A of the Corporation Act 2001, person or organization is solvent if it is possible for that person to pay all the debts at the time when they become due and payable, and person or organization is insolvent if they are not solvent (Corporation Act, 2001). This paper contains detailed discussion on companys insolvency, and also the role of the directors and ASIC in insolvency process. In this statistics related to insolvency of the Australian companies is stated and observance in this context. Subsequently, this paper states the conclusion. Discussion: As stated above, insolvency is the situation when organization is not able to pay its debts and assets of the organization are not enough to pay its liabilities. This can be understood through case law Bell Group Ltd (in liquidation) v Westpac Banking Corporation Others. In this case, court held that primary method for determining the solvency of the organization is the determination of the companys asset and liabilities. Following are some important aspects of insolvency: Signs which reflect companys insolvency: ASIC issues regulatory guide 217 in 2010, which named as Duty to Prevent Insolvent Trading: Guide for Directors. As per this guide following are some signs of the company insolvency which must be determined by the directors of the company at former stage: Company incurred loss in trading, and also face issues related to cash flow. It becomes difficult for the organization to sell their stock or raising funds. With the current financier, organization is negotiating the new limit. Legal actions against the company are commenced by the creditors and other stakeholders of the company. Reasonable measures considered by Board of directors: Directors of the company are under obligation to ensure that reasonable measures have been taken if any above stated sign reflect the insolvency. Some of these measures are stated below: Any further debt must not be incurred by the directors of the company unless any chances of restructuring and refinancing of the business occurred, and funding in the form of the equity is available for recapitalizing the business operations. Directors of the company must appoint voluntary liquidators and administrators. Directors are under obligation to ensure that interest of the creditors and other stakeholders of the company are protected in case company become insolvent or there is any risk related to insolvency. Directors must not engage in any trading with outsiders, if company becomes insolvent or there is any risk related to insolvency. Directors liability in case of insolvency: Various duties are imposed on directors in case company becomes insolvent, such as duty to prevent any trading in the company when company becomes insolvent. This duty is imposed by Section 588G of the corporation Act 2001. As per this section, directors of the company are under obligation to prevent the insolvent trading, and this section is applicable on the directors of the company and on those also who were only acting as the director of the company but in actual they are not appointed as director of the company. This can be understood through case law Hawkins v Bank of China. In this case, Court stated that the list of deemed debts and specified the situation when they occurred. Section 588G further stated that duty is imposed on director of the company from preventing the company to incurred further debt in case: Organization is insolvent at that time when debt is incurred. There is risk of insolvency on organization, if organization incurred that debt or series of debts which includes that debt also. Sufficient grounds are present which reflect the insolvency of the company in case debt is incurred by the company. This can be understood through case law Kenna Brown Pty Ltd v Kenna. In this case Court stated that objective assessment must be conducted by the directors for determining the insolvency. Contravention under this section is divided into two categories that are: In case directors of the company fail to compile section 588G which means director, fails to prevent the debt incurred by the company in that situation also when sufficient grounds are present and reflect that there is risk of insolvency, then such directors are liable under civil provision. Directors of the company held liable under criminal provisions if director fails to prevent the company from incurring debt because of any dishonest reason, and sufficient grounds are present which clearly reflect that company is already insolvent or becomes insolvent (Corporation Act, 2001). In case a director of the company fails to compile with Section 588G then following are the consequences of such failure (AICD, n.d.): Compensation order can be passed by the Court, and this order states that director is held liable towards the company at personal level to pay the compensation, and amount of compensation is the amount of loss suffered by the company (Section 588J and 1317H). Section 1317G states that pecuniary order can be passed by the Court and such order includes the amount up to $200000. This can be understood through case law ASIC v Plymin (No 1). Disqualification order under section 206 of the Act can be passed by the Court, and as per this order director of the company is disqualified to manage the company. If director of the company is held liable under criminal provisions then Court can order fine up to 2,000 penalty units or imprisonment for five years (Corporation Act, 2001). Alternative ways: In case reasonable grounds are present which reflects the risk of insolvency then directors can choose different ways and some of these ways are stated below: Professional advice can be sought by the directors of the company. Invitation can be send to the secured creditors of the company for the purpose of appointing receiver. It is the duty of director to cease the trading, and prevent the company in incurring further debt. Administrator can be appointed by the board under section 436A of the Act (Corporation Act, 2001). Difference between voluntary and involuntary intervention: Voluntary intervention is the method through which company can goes under reorganization. As per this method, external administrator is appointed by the directors and secured creditors of the company. Administrator appointed under this method is known as voluntary administrator. Voluntary administrator conduct investigation related to the affairs of the company and after this investigation he/she will send report to the creditors. This report states the clear views of the administrator on matter whether creditors choose deed of the company arrangement, liquidation, and returned the company to the directors. Voluntary administrator was appointed by the director when directors have sufficient ground to believe that there was risk of insolvency or company was already insolvent. Involuntary intervention is the method under which charge holder, liquidator, or provisional liquidator appoints the administrator. The main difference between two methods is stated below: Under voluntary administrator directors of the company are allowed to exercise similar control, but in involuntary method there is no control exercised by the directors of the company. Voluntary administration provides option to the company to restructure their business, but involuntary administration is considered as the level when there is no hope of business restructuring (Quilan, 2005). Other option: Members winding up is the option available to the company in case company does not want to choose the creditors winding up option. As per this option, special resolution is passed by the members of the company for the purpose of appointing the liquidator (ASIC, n.d.). Section 495 of the Act states that, company appointed liquidator by passing special resolution in the general meeting. Liquidator is appointed for winding up all the operations and affairs of the company and to discharge all the liabilities of the company. Section 495 of the Act further states that if any vacancy occurred in the office of the liquidator because of the death, resignation, and any other matter then members reappoint the liquidator in the general meeting for the purpose of filling the vacancy. For this section general meeting is held by the contributory or in case there are two or more liquidators then by those liquidators (Corporation Act, 2001). Insolvency Statistics in Australia: ASIC issued statistics of the last quarter of the 2016/17, and it states the increased % of the companies which opt for external administration and that increase is up to 28%. Results also show number of States in which liquidation % is increased such as in Western Australia up to 127.9%, Victoria up to 34.7% and New South Wales up to 13.1%, , and on national level it increased up to 25%. Percentage related to those companies under which administrator are appointed by the directors of the company is increase up to 35.9%, but in Victoria this rate is goes up to 57.8%, Queensland up to 28.6% and New South Wales up to 14.4% (ASIC, n.d.). Insolvency issue: In Australia, insolvency law does not considered long term gains of the companies, and it also fails in considering the assets, goodwill, competitiveness, and reasons of premature closure and liquidation. Law related to insolvency does not state any provisions which provide emphasis on restructuring of the business and any other method through which company return to profitability and protect the interest of creditors. There are many other countries in which focus is shifted on restructuring of business and not on the liquidation. There are some recommendations which can be included in the insolvency law of Australia: Law must focus on the long term plannings while decided liquidation. Protection of employees and workers at the time of liquidation of the company. Provisions which provide various options through which funds for restructuring the business can be raised (ASIC, n.d.). ASIC ROLE: Company can deregistered by ASIC, if sufficient grounds are present which state that trading is ceased by the company and fees and penalties are overdue, and these sufficient grounds are stated below: If company fails to pay its annual fee within the time period of 12 months from the date on which fee becomes due. Compliance notice is issued to the company, and company fails to submit the response of that notice and also the related documents within 18 months. Processing related to winding up is initiated and no liquidator is appointed (ASIC, n.d.). Observation: Various legislations and case laws clear the picture that provisions of corporate act 2001 related to insolvency mainly give emphasis on companys liquidation. These provisions do not consider the restructuring of the business or any other measures through which liquidation can be avoided. imposed on companies which put extra pressure on companies and also reduce the ability of company to discharge the debts of the creditor. In Ascot Community Sports Club Incorporated (in liquidation), court stated that liquidator has right to claim their cost from the company, and company was liable to pay the cost. Court further stated if liquidator incurred any other cost then also company was liable to pay it. Conclusion: After considering the above facts it is clear that directors play very important role in insolvency procedure, and it is completely in the hands of directors to ensure the interest of the creditors and other stakeholders of the company. In this paper all the issues and their measures related to insolvency are discussed and these issues and measures are supported by the legislations and case laws References: AICD. Insolvent trading. Available at: https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/~/media/cd2/resources/director-resources/director-tools/pdf/05446-6-3-duties-directors_insolvent-trading_a4-web.ashx. Accessed on 21st August 2017. Ascot Community Sports Club Incorporated (in liquidation) [2014] QSC 258. ASIC v Plymin (No 1) (2003) 175 FLR 124; 21 ACLC 700; 46, ACSR 126; [2003] VSC 123 at 777 (ACLC). ASIC, ( 2010). Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Guide for directors. Available at: https://download.asic.gov.au/media/1241384/rg217-29july2010.pdf. Accessed on 21st August 2017. ASIC. ASIC initiated deregistration of company. Available at: https://www.asic.gov.au/for-business/closing-your-company/deregistration/asic-initiated-deregistration-of-company/#ReasonsforDereg. Accessed on 21st August 2017. ASIC. Corporate insolvencies: June quarter 2017. Available at: https://download.asic.gov.au/media/4410590/201706-june-qtr-2017-summary-analysis.pdf. Accessed on 21st August 2017. ASIC. Types of Insolvency. Available at: https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/insolvency/types-of-insolvency/. Accessed on 21st August 2017. Bell Group Ltd (in liq) v Westpac Banking Corporation Ors [No 9] [2008] WASC 239 (Bell). Corporation Act 2001- Section 1317G. Corporation Act 2001- Section 1317H. Corporation Act 2001- Section 206. Corporation Act 2001- Section 436A. Corporation Act 2001- Section 495. Corporation Act 2001- Section 588G. Corporation Act 2001- Section 588J. Corporation Act 2001- Section 95. Gupta, N. Insolvency laws in Australia. Available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/BriefingBook45p/InsolvencyLaws. Accessed on 21st August 2017. Hawkins v Bank of China (1992) 26 NSWLR 562; 10 ACLC, 588; 7 ACSR 349 at 572 (NSWLR). Kenna Brown Pty Ltd v Kenna (1999) 17 ACLC 1,183; 32, ACSR 432; [1999] NSWSC 533 [CL s 588G 1994]. Long v. Home Health Services, 43 Wn. App. 729, 734 (1986). Quinlan, M. (2005). Formal Reorganization in Australia. Available at: https://www.allens.com.au/pubs/pdf/insol/pap15mar05.pdf. Accessed on 21st August 2017.