Why The North Won The Civil Wa Essay Example For Students

Why The North Won The Civil Wa Essay The American antebellum South, though steeped in pride and raised inmilitary tradition, was to be no match for the burgeoning superiority ofthe rapidly developing North in the coming Civil War. The lack ofemphasis on manufacturing and commercial interest, stemming from theSouthern desire to preserve their traditional agrarian society,surrendered to the North their ability to function independently, muchless to wage war. It was neither Northern troops nor generals that wonthe Civil War, rather Northern guns and industry. From the onset of war, the Union had obvious advantages. Quite simply,the North had large amounts of just about everything that the South didnot, boasting resources that the Confederacy had even no means ofattaining (See Appendices, Brinkley et al. 415). Sheer manpower ratioswere unbelievably one-sided, with only nine of the nations 31 millioninhabitants residing in the seceding states (Angle 7). The Union alsohad large amounts of land available for growing food crops which servedthe dual purpose of providing food for its hungry soldiers and money forits ever-growing industries. The South, on the other hand, devoted mostof what arable land it had exclusively to its main cash crop: cotton(Catton, The Coming Fury 38). Raw materials were almost entirelyconcentrated in Northern mines and refining industries. Railroads andtelegraph lines, the veritable lifelines of any army, traced paths allacross the Northern countryside but left the South isolated, outdated,and starving (See Appendices) . The final death knell for a modern Southdeveloped in the form of economic colonialism. The Confederates wereall too willing to sell what little raw materials they possessed toNorthern Industry for any profit they could get. Little did they know,King Cotton could buy them time, but not the war. The South hadbartered something that perhaps it had not intended: its independence(Catton, Reflections 143). We will write a custom essay on Why The North Won The Civil Wa specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The Norths ever-growing industry was an important supplement to itseconomical dominance of the South. Between the years of 1840 and 1860,American industry saw sharp and steady growth. In 1840 the total valueof goods manufactured in the United States stood at $483 million,increasing over fourfold by 1860 to just under $2 billion, with theNorth taking the kings ransom (Brinkley et al. 312). The underlyingreason behind this dramatic expansion can be traced directly to theAmerican Industrial Revolution. Beginning in the early 1800s, traces of the industrial revolution inEngland began to bleed into several aspects of the American society. One of the first industries to see quick development was the textileindustry, but, thanks to the British government, this development almostnever came to pass. Years earlier, Englands James Watt had developedthe first successful steam engine. This invention, coupled with thebirth of James Hargreaves spinning jenny, completely revolutionized theBritish textile industry, and eventually made it the most profitable inthe world (Industrial Revolution). The British government,parsimonious with its newfound knowledge of machinery, attempted toprotect the nations manufacturing preeminence by preventing the exportof textile machinery and even the emigration of skilled mechanics. Despite valiant attempts at deterrence, though, many immigrants managedto make their way into the United States with the advanced knowledge ofEnglish technology, and they were anxiou s to acquaint America with thenew machines (Furnas 303). And acquaint the Americans they did: more specifically, New EnglandAmericans. It was people like Samuel Slater who can be credited withbeginning the revolution of the textile industry in America. A skilledmechanic in England, Slater spent long hours studying the schematics forthe spinning jenny until finally he no longer needed them. He emigratedto Pawtucket, Rhode Island, and there, together with a Quaker merchantby the name of Moses Brown, he built a spinning jenny from memory(Furnas 303). This meager mill would later become known as the firstmodern factory in America. It would also become known as the point atwhich the North began its economic domination of the Confederacy. Although slow to accept change, The South was not entirely unaffectedby the onset of the Industrial Revolution. Another inventor by the nameof Eli Whitney set out in 1793 to revolutionize the Southern cottonindustry. Whitney was working as a tutor for a plantation owner inGeorgia (he was also, ironically, born and raised in New England) andtherefore knew the problems of harvesting cotton (Brinkley et al. 200). Until then, the arduous task of separating the seeds from the cottonbefore sale had been done chiefly by slave labor and was, consequently,very inefficient. Whitney developed a machine which would separate theseed from the cotton swiftly and effectively, cutting the harvestingtime by more than one half (Industrial Revolution). This machine,which became known as the cotton gin, had profound results on the South,producing the highest uptrend the industry had ever, and would ever,see. In that decade alone cotton production figures increased by morethan 2000 percent (Randall and Donald 36). Enormous amounts of businessopportunities opened up, including, perhaps most importantly, theexpansion of the Southern plantations. This was facilitated by the factthat a single worker could now do the same amount of work in a few hoursthat a group of workers had once needed a whole day to do (Brinkl ey etal. 201). This allowed slaves to pick much more cotton per day andtherefore led most plantation owners to expand their land base. Themonetary gains of the cash crop quickly took precedence over the basicnecessity of the food crop, which could be gotten elsewhere. In 1791cotton production amounted to only 4000 bales, but by 1860, productionlevels had skyrocketed to just under five million bales (Randall andDonald 36). Cotton was now bringing in nearly $200 million a year,which constituted almost two-thirds of the total export trade (Brinkleyet al. 329). King Cotton was born, and it soon became a fundamentalmotive in Southern diplomacy. However, during this short burst ofeconomic prowess, the South failed to realize that it would never besustained by King Cotton alone. What it needed was the guiding handof Queen Industry.Eli Whitney soon came to realize that the South would not readilyaccept change, and decided to take his inventive mind back up to theNorth, where it could be put to good use. He found his niche in thesmall arms business. Previously, during two long years of quasi-warwith France, Americans had been vexed by the lack of rapidity with whichsufficient armaments could be produced. Whitney came to the rescue withthe invention of interchangeable parts. His vision of the perfectfactory included machines which would produce, from a preshaped mold,the various components needed to build a standard infantry rifle, andworkers on an assembly line who would construct it (IndustrialRevolution). The North, eager to experiment and willing to tryanything that smacked of economic progress, decided to test the watersof this inviting new method of manufacture. It did not take theresourceful Northerners very long to actualize Eli Whitneys dream andmake mass production a reality. The small arms industry boomed, andkept on booming. By the onset of the Civil War, the confederate stateswere dolefully noting the fact that there were thirty-eight Union armsfactories ca pable of producing a total of 5,000 infantry rifles per day,compared with their own paltry capacity of 100 (Catton, Glory Road 241). .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 , .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .postImageUrl , .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 , .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:hover , .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:visited , .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:active { border:0!important; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:active , .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9 .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uf3b6ccee0258800c6fe815879d5151a9:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: What Causes the Apparent Daily Motions of the Sun and Stars Across the Sky? EssayDuring the mid-1800s, the Industrial Revolution dug its spurs deep intothe side of the Northern states. Luckily, immigration numbers wereskyrocketing at this time, and the sudden profusion of factory positionsthat needed to be filled was not a big problem (See Appendices andRandall and Donald 1-2). The immigrants, who were escaping anythingfrom the Irish Potato Famine to British oppression, were willing to workfor almost anything and withstand inhuman factory conditions (Jones). Although this exploitation was extremely cruel and unfair to theimmigrants, Northern businessmen profited immensely from it (Brinkley etal. 264)By the beginning of war in 1860, the Union, from an economicalstandpoint, stood like a towering giant over the stagnant Southernagrarian society. Of the over 128,000 industrial firms in the nation atthis time, the Confederacy held only 18,026. New England alone toppedthe figure with over 19,000, and so did Pennsylvania 21,000 and New Yorkwith 23,000 (Paludan 105). The total value of goods manufactured in thestate of New York alone was over four times that of the entireConfederacy. The Northern states produced 96 percent of the locomotivesin the country, and, as for firearms, more of them were made in oneConnecticut county than in all the Southern factories combined (CivilWar, Encyclopedia Americana). The Confederacy had made one fatal mistake: believing that its thrivingcotton industry alone would be enough to sustain itself throughout thewar. Southerners saw no need to venture into the uncharted industrialterritories when good money could be made with cotton. What they failedto realize was that the cotton boom had done more for the North than ithad done for the South. Southerners could grow vast amounts of cotton,but due to the lack of mills, they could do nothing with it. Consequently, the cotton was sold to the Northerners who would use it intheir factories to produce wools and linens, which were in turn soldback to the South. This cycle stimulated industrial growth in the Unionand stagnated it in the Confederate states (Catton, Reflections 144). Southern plantation owners erred in believing that the growing textileindustries of England and France were highly dependent on their cotton,and that, in the event of war, those countries would come to theirrescue (Civil War, World Bo ok). They believed that the North wouldthen be forced to acquiesce to the perfect Southern society. Theywere wrong. During the war years, the economical superiority of the Union, whichhad been so eminent before the war, was cemented. The Civil War gave aneven bigger boost to the already growing factories in the North. Thetroops needed arms and warm clothes on a constant basis, and NorthernIndustry was glad to provide them. By 1862, the Union could boast ofits capacity to manufacture almost all of its own war materials usingits own resources (Brinkley et al. 415). The South, on the other hand,was fatally dependent on outside resources for its war needs. Dixie was not only lagging far behind in the factories. It had alsochosen to disregard two other all-important areas in which the North hadchosen to thrive: transportation and communication. . . . the Railroad, the Locomotive, and the Telegraph- -iron, steam,and lightning-these three mighty genii of civilization . . . will knowno lasting pause until the whole vast line of railway shall completedfrom the Atlantic to the Pacific. (Furnas 357)During the antebellum years, the North American populace especially hadshown a great desire for an effective mode of transportation. For along time, canals had been used to transport people and goods acrosslarge amounts of land which were accessible by water, but, withcontinuing growth and expansion, these canals were becoming obsolete anda symbol of frustration to many Northerners. They simply needed a wayto transport freight and passengers across terrains where waterways didnot exist (Brinkley et al. 256-59). The first glimmer of hope came as Americas first primitive locomotive,powered by a vertical wood-fired boiler, puffed out of Charlestonhauling a cannon and gun crew firing salutes (Catton, Glory Road 237). Ironically enough, this revolution had begun in the South, but there itwould not prosper. The Railroading industry quickly blossomed in theNorth, where it provided a much needed alternative to canals, but couldnever quite get a foothold in the South. Much of this can be accreditedto the fact that Northern engineers were experienced in the field ofironworking and had no problem constructing vast amounts of intricaterail lines, while Southerners, still fledglings in the field, simplyhobbled. .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb , .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .postImageUrl , .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb , .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:hover , .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:visited , .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:active { border:0!important; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:active , .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u066f043910b362281419a3370b919acb:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The rental hearts EssayThis hobbling was quite unmistakable at the outbreak of the Civil War. The Union, with its some 22,000 miles of track, was able to transportweaponry, clothes, food, soldiers, and whatever supplies were needed toalmost any location in the entire theater. Overall, this greatly aidedthe Northern war effort and worked to increase the morale of thetroops. The South, on the other hand, could not boast such logistical prowess. With its meager production of only four percent of thenations locomotives and its scant 9,000 miles of track, the Confederacystood in painful awareness of its inferiority (Randall and Donald 8). Trackage figures alone, though, do not tell the entire story of theweakness of the Souths railroads system. Another obstacle arose inthe problem of track gauge. The gauge, or width of track, frequentlyvaried from rail to rail in the South. Therefore, goods would oftenhave to be taken off one train and transferred to another before movingon to their final destination. Any perishable goods had to be stored inwarehouses if there were any delays, and this was not an uncommonoccurrence. There also existed a problem in the fact that there werelarge gaps between many crucial parts of the South, which requiredsuppliers to make detours over long distances or to carry goods betweenrails by wagon (Catton, The Coming Fury 434). As the war progressed,the Confederate railroad system steadily deteriorated, and, by the endof the struggle, it had all but collapsed. Communication, or rather lack thereof, was another impediment toSouthern economical growth. The telegraph had burst into American lifein 1844, when Samuel Morse first transmitted, from the Supreme Courtchamber in the capitol to Alfred Vail in Baltimore, his famous wordsWhat hath God wrought! (Brinkley et al. 314). The advent of thisfresh form of communication greatly facilitated the operation of therailroad lines in the North. Telegraph lines ran along the tracks,connecting one station to the next and aiding the scheduling of thetrains. Moreover, the telegraph provided instant communication betweendistant cities, tying the nation together like never before. Yet,ironically, it also buttressed the growing schism between the twodiverging societies (314). The South, unimpressed by this new moderntechnology and not having the money to experiment, chose not to delvevery deeply into its development. Pity, they would learn to regret it. By 1860, the North had laid over 90 percent of the nations some 50,000miles of telegraph wire. Morses telegraph had become an ideal answerto the problems of long-distance communication, with its latest triumphof land taking shape in the form of the Pacific telegraph, which ranfrom New York to San Francisco and used 3,595 miles of wire (Brinkley etal. 315). The North, as with all telegraph lines, embraced itsrelatively low cost and ease of construction. The Pacific telegraphbrought the agricultural Northwest together with the more industriousNortheast and the blossoming West, forming an alliance which would proveto break the back of the ever-weakening South (324-25). The Civil War was a trying time for both the Union and the Confederacyalike, but the question of its outcome was obvious from the start. TheNorth was guaranteed a decisive victory over the ill-equipped South. Northerners, prepared to endure the deprivation of war, were startled tofind that they were experiencing an enormo us industrial boom even afterthe first year of war. Indeed, the only Northern industry that sufferedfrom the war was the carrying trade (Catton, Reflections 144). To theSouth, however, the war was a draining and debilitating leech, suckingthe land dry of any semblance of economical formidability. No financialstaple was left untouched; all were subject to diminishment andexhaustion. This agrarian South, with its traditional values andbeliefs, decided not to cultivate two crops which would prove quitecrucial in the outcome of the Civil War. Those crops were industry andprogress, and without them the South was doomed to defeat. A wise manhe was, that Union General William Tecumseh Sherman. A wise man indeed. Appendices(Note: appendices taken from Brinkley et al. 315-17, 415)Works CitedAngle, Paul M. A Pictorial History of the Civil War Years. GardenCity, New York:Doubleday, 1967. Brinkley, Alan, et al. American History: A Survey. New York: McGraw,1991. Catton, Bruce. The Army of the Potomac: Glory Road. Garden City, NewYork: Doubleday, 1952. . The Coming Fury. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1961. Vol 2of The Centennial History of the Civil War. 3 vols. n.d. . Reflections on the Civil War. Ed. John Leekley. 1st ed. GardenCity, New York:Doubleday, 1981. Civil War. Encyclopedia Americana. 1987 ed. Civil War. World Book Encyclopedia. 1981 ed. Cotton. World Book Encyclopedia. 1981 ed. Furnas, J.C.. The Americans: A Social History of the United States1587-1914. New York:Putnam, 1969. Jones, Donald C. Telephone Interview. 28 Feb. 1993. Industrial Revolution. World Book Encyclopedia. 1981 ed. Paludan, Philip Shaw. A Peoples Contest. New York: Harper, 1988. Randall, J.G., and David Herbert Donald. The Civil War andReconstruction. Lexington,Massachusetts: Heath, 1969.

Women of ancient greece and egypt essays

Women of ancient greece and egypt essays Equality in the ancient world was not the same as it is today. In ancient Greece women were not looked upon as equals. They were considered to be secondary in relation to men. On the other hand the women of ancient Egypt enjoyed many of the same freedoms as the men did. They, unlike women in most cultures of the time, were considered more or less equals. Ideally this social equality would have been the same for all ancient women. Ancient Greece was the cradle of western civilization. It was a land comprised of small city states. Often in history books, the men of this time are only mentioned and the women are too easily forgotten, but we must not forget the women that lived in this time, for they played just as significant a role in creating and in making this culture inspiring to this day. Women in archaic Greece were prepared for marriage and motherhood through dancing and singing and participating in other religious events. Athenian girls knew how to dance, but music was not something that was considered to be very respectable. In Sparta, and generally among Dorian city-states, women enjoyed more freedom and thus participated in music, dancing and telling stories without being looked down upon. An example of this was the maiden songs which were sung by young women on the brink of adulthood, as rites of passage into adulthood. Women writers, most often, wrote lyric poetry. They tended to focus on emotions, lovers, friendships, and other events in their lives. Their honesty and simplicity conveyed sincerity, thus making these poems very popular. Most poems and songs were accompanied by the playing of a lyre. The lyres sound was considered dignified and soothing, and was often associated with upper class women. Flute music however, was considered to be more exciting and thus was the resort of professional musicians, slaves, and prostitutes. Hetairai used flutes to provide background music at symposiums. Women wrote...

Levendary Cafe Case Assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Levendary Cafe Case Assignment - Essay Example Numerous attempts to make him change his style yield no such results and another individual has to be taken to the office in China and ensure that he is implementing the changes being made by the management back in the US and monitor his work in the process. The other problem being faced is that of Chen being insubordinate towards the overall changes and order provided by the head CEO of the company. His attitude is what makes him have all these problems with sticking to the rules provided about the way to do business in China despite him being the head. It is these negative attitudes and the lack of subordination towards the CEO that is making questions to be raised about his future working in the company and whether a new manager should start being sought to replace him. The last problem that seems to be in existence in the China branch is that of financial reports. The Levendary Cafà © uses the GAAP format to make its reports so that they are all uniform and easy to translate but Chen seems rather resistant in adopting this system leaving the accountants in the US to have to carry out another set of extra work reading and changing the report to the format used which is international. As a result of the lack of properly recorded and provided financial reports, the mother branch is thinking of bringing in a financial analyst into the China branch to examine the books and explain whether this branch is making profits or not and to whether these profits can sustain expanding of the China branch as well. This analysis will determine Chen’s future with the company. The other alternative is to let Chen continue working on the China project despite his negative attitudes, insubordination and problems with the financial reporting but provide a new deadline to break even or be replaced. If Chen cannot accept a new deadline to be set for him or accept a financial analyst to be brought in to access the financial

People Capability Maturity Model Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

People Capability Maturity Model - Research Paper Example The long-term success of an organization entirely depends upon its success in the talent market. These days talent market is dwindling rapidly with expansion in business market. Due to lack of talent some organizations have started offering incentives to ordinary employees that were once offered to talented and 0ld employees. The challenges related to talent hunt are extended further than recruiting and retention. At the very time competing for hiring talented people is not sufficient. Because trying hard to win just talent war can be harmful for the organization. A homogeneous balance between business and talent war is the golden key to success. Organizations must make every effort to develop a healthy learning environment so that the entire workforce keeps on refreshing their skills with changing demands of the market. A very vital constituent of any organization is a labor force having knowledge and skills to make rapid modifications and ability to get hold of new skills. Such a r esponsive workforce is a great asset for an organization. Organizations have stabbed to adapt different techniques to improve human capital. To achieve a better human capital management system most of the organizations came up with different ideas like getting better ways of information sharing, arranging interactive workshops for employees, highlighting the mission and vision statements of organization, practicing downsizing, founding attractive incentive policies, launching complaint handling system, conducting various seminars and conferences to throw light on importance of training and continuous learning for employees, supporting the unique concept of job rotation, giving employees the relaxation to work from home and conducting regular training session. What many corporations require is a framework to implement these wonderful ideas. Now trends are changing rapidly in market. These changing trends have affected workforce badly. The scenario in business is totally opposite now that’s why in order to keep pace with these changing trends employees need to enhance their knowledge and skills constantly. This is the war of talent and employees have to try hard to win this war. Doers must be thinkers, people are the real assets for any organization, workforce is actually the investment, centralized decisions, continuous struggle for improvements and centralized network are some of the advanced concepts in business. Since people are now the real asset for any organization so in order to hire and maintain talented workforce its inevitable to follow a strategy that could help an organization to address the problems being faced by the workforce. The organizations have to focus on three interconnected components i.e. people, process and technology. With the help of People Capability Maturity Model many organizations have made excellent improvements in their products and services. The People CMM is an organizational change model. It is based on the fact that w orkforce training practices won’t endure until and unless organization changes its behavior to support them. The People CMM presents a plan for renovating an organization by gradually civilizing its labor force practices. The People CMM consists of five evolutionary stages, at every maturity level; a new structure of practices is added to already implemented at previous levels. Each superimposition of practices elevates the level of

Article Review of “Fat and Happy” Essay Example for Free

Article Review of â€Å"Fat and Happy† Essay In â€Å"Fat and Happy: In Defense of Fat Acceptance,† Mary Ray Worley offers a poignant account of her participation in a conference held by the National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance. She compares attending this conference with visiting another planet. Until she had the opportunity to visit this other planet, she had not realized just how ostracized she felt. (Worley, element 1). Her participation in this conference made her realize that â€Å"20th century American society† (Worley, element 4) is very much responsible for the shame that she and other overweight individuals have been made to feel. While there are several aspects of society that contribute to the alienation of individuals who are overweight, Worley suggests that the medical field bears a great deal of the responsibility: â€Å"Although the data gathered for most current studies indicate that body size is primarily determined by one’s genetic makeup, most researchers conclude–in spite of their own findings–that fat individuals should try to lose weight anyway† (Worley, element 3). She than goes on to argue that oftentimes attempts to diet only result in more weight gain. Worley marvels that â€Å"apparently [scientists] cannot bring themselves to say that since body size is largely a result of one’s genetic makeup it’s best to get on with the business of learning to live in the body you have, whatever its size† (Worley, element 5). She also claims that doctors often make the situation worse: â€Å"Regardless of the ailment†¦your doctor may put you on a diet before she treats your cough† (Worley, element 6). I believe that Worley makes a good point regarding the medical profession, but there is indeed a great deal of research that links obesity with increased heart problems among other things, which Worley ignores in this essay. In her uplifting conclusion, Worley encourages overweight individuals to love their bodies despite what society may say about them. You’re entitled to the space you take up. You can find clothes that show off the gorgeous person you are, you can play and dance without self-consciousness, you can be proud of yourself and never dread unwanted attention, you can be a brave pioneer and a friend to those who have suffered on planets less kind and less joyous than this one (Worley, element 2). In light of the many forces that are stacked against overweight individuals in our society, Worley’s words of encouragement are astute and empowering.

Shakespeare :: essays research papers

William Shakespeare   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   William Shakespeare was a great English playwright, dramatist and poet who lived during the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. Shakespeare is considered to be the greatest playwright of all time. No other writer's plays have been produced so many times or read so widely in so many countries as his. Shakespeare was born to middle class parents. His father, John, was a Stratford businessman. He was a glove maker who owned a leather shop. John Shakespeare was a well-known and respected man in the town. He held several important local governmental positions. William Shakespeare's mother was Mary Arden. Though she was the daughter of a local farmer, she was related to a wealthy family. Mary Arden and John Shakespeare were married in 1557. William Shakespeare was born in Stratford in 1564. He was one of eight children. The Shakespeare's were well-respected prominent people. When William Shakespeare was about seven years old, he probably began attending the Stratford Grammar School with other boys of his social class. Students went to school year round attending school for nine hours a day. The teachers were strict disciplinarians. Though Shakespeare spent long hours at school, his boyhood was probably fascinating. Stratford was a lively town and during holidays, it was known to put on pageants and many popular shows. It also held several large fairs during the year. Stratford was an exciting place to live. Stratford also had fields and woods surrounding it giving William the opportunity to hunt and trap small game. The River Avon, which ran through the town, allowed him to fish also. Shakespeare's' poems and plays show his love of nature and rural life which reflects his childhood. On November 28, 1582, Shakespeare married Anne Hathaway of the neighboring village of Shottery. She was twenty-six, and he was only eighteen at the time. They had three children. Susana was their first and then they had twins, Hamnet and Judith. Hamnet, Shakespeare's son, died in 1596. In 1607, his daughter Susana got married. Shakespeare's other daughter, Judith, got married in 1616. In London, Shakespeare's career took off. It is believed that he may have become well known in London theatrical life by 1592. By that time, he had joined one of the city's repertory theater companies. These companies were made up of a permanent cast of actors who presented different plays week after week. The companies were commercial organizations that depended on admission from their audience.

Satirical Mouthpiece in the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Typically when you hear â€Å"19th century literature,† you think of the formal and monotonous, yet gramatically and contextually correct writing of authors such as Charles Dickens and Harriet Beecher Stowe; but one author stood out among them and his name was Mark Twain. Twain started a new trend of including new aspects of writing into his pieces such as voice, dialect, and satire. The one particular book written by Mark Twain that is known to be the beginning of American literature called The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, contains all three of these aspects. In the book, Twain uses the main character and narrator, Huck, to utilize his voice, dialect, and satire. Huck serves as a satirical mouthpiece for the author’s attitude by fulfilling his role as the naive narrator. There is a specific passage in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn that accurately portrays the satire that Twain is trying to bestow upon the reader involving a character by the name of Emmeline Grangerford, a sentimental artist. Huck is inspecting the art of Emmeline and expressing his feelings about them in the text. If you read Huck’s explanations without examining the underlying meanings you will find that Huck is completely clueless as to the artists’ sentimental intentions. He evaluates one picture called â€Å"Shall I Never See Thee More Alas† by describing a woman â€Å"under a weeping willow† (Twain 119) in a graveyard, another picture with a woman â€Å"crying into a handkerchief† (Twain 119), and yet another with a crying woman about to jump off a bridge. All three of these illustrations are obvious cliches of sentimental art of the 19th century. Huck looks at the images and simply sees â€Å"nice pictures† (Twain 119), not realizing the intent of the artist, Emmeline. This is an excellent example of Huck’s role as the naive narrator. His lack of understanding provides a completely different take on the art than Mark Twain actually feels. Twain’s main intention of the passage is to poke fun at the sentimentalists’ artwork. He includes Huck’s explanations such as bulges on a dress â€Å"like a cabbage† (Twain 119), and â€Å"black slippers, like a chisel† (Twain 119) to mock the sentimental art which was poplular at the time that he wrote the book. Writing the passage in Huck’s point of view allowed Twain to add satire to the story by making Huck’s comments so cliche and ridiculous that it is obvious that this is not actually the way that Twain feels about the sentimental artwork. This is why the character of Huck, being as clueless as he is in the book, is necessary for him to serve as the author’s satirical mouthpiece. Huckleberry Finn is certainly not the typical narrator of a book. To understand the context of the writing, one must decipher what is actually occuring in the story and what Huck thinks is occuring because of his role as the naive narrator. Although this makes the book more difficult to comprehend, it also makes it more interesting to read and allows the author, Mark Twain, to include such factors of voice, dialect, and satire. The narrator’s conception of the storyline is extremely important to the book. Huck serves as a satirical mouthpiece for the author’s attitude by fulfilling his role as the naive narrator.